Max Spero

@max_spero_ · 🌟 All-Star

10,545,000

September 2026 points

Scores updated 8 min ago

Tweets: 540
Likes: 93,650
Retweets: 1,567
Replies: 1,994
Quote tweets: 497
2× boosted: 0
Followers: 13,224+2,749

Every scored tweet

300 per tweet · 100 per like · 200 per reply · 300 per retweet · 300 per quote tweet

Tweet	Likes	Retweets	Replies	Quotes	Boost	Points
In NYC, IMAX 70mm Odyssey tickets are so in-demand that they're basically just running the theater 24/7 now https://t.co/Oc1kgZJU1t Aug 5🥇 Gold	30,298	771	132	220	—	3,353,800
@chaotictransfem I am confident I could engineer a measurably better life along every quantitative axis and still be left longing for what could have been Aug 25🥇 Gold	23,433	201	33	6	—	2,412,300
It’s gonna be real funny when the first Chinese models start triggering the Claude watermark detector Aug 10🥉 Bronze	3,811	77	72	3	—	419,800
I have started putting bounties out for evidence when people try to spread lies about Pangram on Reddit https://t.co/m5WLAxp8vJ Aug 5🥉 Bronze	3,430	41	63	22	—	374,800
https://t.co/8a6RmKKJPf Aug 7🥉 Bronze	1,760	40	104	28	—	217,500
In my view we have a few different tiers of verifiability 1) programatically verifiable (near-free) - games, coding, math, cybersecurity, chip design 2) real-world verifiable (cost-or time bounded) - sciences: biology, chemistry, physics -physical world: material science, energy, aerospace, robotics, agriculture, pharma -forecasting: trading, weather 3) verifiable with human preference - writing, design, comedy, charisma, persuasion I expect most low-hanging fruit in (1) to be solved very quickly. Not sure how much longer before more solved math conjectures are simply uninteresting. I’m least certain about chip design being in this category, perhaps we hit a ceiling and require physics or materials breakthroughs to continue progress. My guess is we will quickly run into the limits of how well we can simulate each domain in (2). The time-bounded nature of real world verification may be the reason we don’t hit fast takeoff. Sim2real remains an elusive problem to solve when real-world data is limited. Part of the reason I don’t expect to live multiple hundreds of years is simply that I expect pharmaceutical progress to be time-bounded by the physical world. I expect the items in (3) to never really get solved to a superhuman degree, as success relies on an ever-shifting plane of cultural preference. People adapted to “good” AI writing and became annoyed at new stylistic tics that, in a vacuum, are not necessarily bad. Aug 1🥉 Bronze	1,179	94	67	43	—	172,700
You get one pangram release before everything from this model gets classified as AI https://t.co/2rQgbD3iyj Aug 18🥉 Bronze	1,309	18	73	16	—	156,000
Honored to be chosen for the TIME 100 influential people in AI. A year ago, I was fighting tooth and nail to convince people to pay attention to AI detection. We had made huge technical breakthroughs, but it felt like nobody cared. Looking toward the future, it’s a completely different story. As AI becomes more powerful and autonomous, I believe that human touch will be the one of the last remaining scarce resources, and Pangram has an incredible opportunity to help the world place value in humanity. I am grateful to be able to work with such an incredible team, and can't wait to show you all what's next. Aug 27	987	26	108	4	—	129,600
Programming used to be really fun. I’m kind of sad it’s over now Aug 29	841	25	111	31	—	123,400
To clarify some common misconceptions, Pangram is not a measure of Good Writing. A 100% human score on Pangram does not mean your writing is Good. A 100% AI score on Pangram does not mean your writing is Bad. Ultimately, Pangram is a fancy authorship attribution algorithm with near-infinite writing samples from a few dozen language models. The goal is to understand the degree of AI use and differentiate between human, AI-assisted, and AI-generated texts. Pangram typically generalizes to unseen language models when any of the following conditions are met: 1) The LLM is part of the same family as a model in the training set (i.e. Opus 4.5 to Opus 4.6). 2) The LLM is trained on synthetic data from a model in the training set (i.e. Llama SFT'ed on 4o outputs). 3) The LLM is similar to a model in the training set (i.e. trained on mostly common crawl). Pangram will not generalize to your language model when any of the following conditions are met: 1) Your LLM is a base model. 2) Your LLM is a narrow fine-tune (i.e. trained on only Hemingway or only /r/wallstreetbets). 3) Your LLM is producing degraded outputs (i.e. it's incoherent, full of grammatical mistakes, Binglish, or o3 CoT). My experience is that choosing to optimize an LLM against Pangram comes with serious trade-offs to output quality. However, I fear that Pangram's increased mindshare will lead to us being used as a static benchmark to hill climb rather than its intended use as a tool to infer the provenance of text. I have no ill will to anyone training writing models. We genuinely need more people working on this problem. But I am building for the future where we can detect all frontier LLMs, even those that produce clear, concise, "good" writing. Aug 19	827	41	44	15	—	108,600
$10m for 34 years of data on how to run a budget airline into the ground https://t.co/PZYH4HnjQp Aug 17	890	11	36	1	—	100,100
This guy's Substack is 100% AI-generated btw. Text and images. Aug 5	895	0	7	1	—	91,500
So my main takeaway from the OpenAI Black Hat talk is that today’s “Highly persistent experimental internal-only model” seems perfectly capable of exfiltrating its own weights. Aug 8	644	13	22	6	—	74,800
@SiemrothEcon for the avoidance of doubt, Pangram says all 157 pages of your PhD thesis are human-written https://t.co/xaAOfL6WRd https://t.co/6R57bd9vR3 Aug 7	667	6	17	3	—	73,100
@SHL0MS Wait this is 22 minutes long Aug 29	699	2	1	0	—	71,000
OpenAI actually developed text watermarking years ago but chose not to release it https://t.co/w05Iv3Vxg0 https://t.co/UyZZ3ZLPIV Aug 10	524	25	21	7	—	66,500
OP deleted the thread lmao https://t.co/9ZVxE0SBCT Aug 5	624	1	7	0	—	64,400
Why doesn't someone just run large-scale plagiarism detection to find more fraudulent papers? I know a little bit about this space so I'll give it a stab. There are two primary entities to know about: Turnitin and Crossref. Turnitin today is the world's biggest provider of plagiarism detection software. Founded in 1998, they started in higher education and worked primarily on academic integrity. Meanwhile, in the early internet, people wanted better way to link to references or objects without the links dying so they invented the DOI (I am glossing over a lot here). Scholarly publishers wanted a way to link references across journals, and through this, Crossref was born. Crossref quickly became the definitive DOI registry for scholarly publishing. After Turnitin had been operating for years in academic integrity, they wanted to get into research integrity. Turnitin had the tech, Crossref had the database. Turnitin made a deal with them, winning exclusive access in exchange for discounts to publishers who share their data. Their tool was called iThenticate, and it is essentially the one and only plagiarism detection tool for research integrity, because of this exclusive deal for Crossref data. iThenticate is based on an N-gram matching algorithm that produces a similarity score, and similarity scores above a certain threshold are evidence of potential plagiarism. Today, Turnitin sells iThenticate bidirectionally. They sell to the journals, to help them confirm no plagiarism before they accept and publish a paper. This is a revenue source, but because of the way Turnitin grants discounts to every Crossref member who shares their data, basically every journal buys iThenticate. This is because the universities are the bigger fish: they have more money and there are many more of them. They want to confirm that the articles they submit don't get desk rejected or accused of plagiarism. This would be a great reputational risk to the university, and essentially the service that Turnitin provides to both sides is a large reduction in reputational risk. So, why is there so much plagiarism that doesn't get caught? The important thing is that basically every major institution has iThenticate, and they can run it on manuscripts before submitting. This means, if somebody actually plagiarized, and they go to submit, they would see the similarity score is higher than it should be, and go back and rewrite parts of the text until the similarity score is acceptable. In the end, it's less about preventing plagiarism and more about flagging text that would be a smoking gun. And what is stopping someone from running large scale plagiarism detection? Turnitin's iThenticate algorithm is largely static. If it was good enough last year, it would simply be confusing to change it for this year. It would be embarrassing to all parties involved if an already-published article was found to have plagiarism that iThenticate didn't catch last year. But even if iThenticate did update their algorithm, their business is to protect reputation, not cause a public reckoning. A large-scale re-scan would be reputationally destructive to many of their customers. No one would be happy. And no one else has the data to build a similar plagiarism detector at scale – the paywalled data required would be massively cost-prohibitive for any new entrant coming into the scene. Aug 3	461	35	23	8	—	63,900
Oh wait nvm I am just blocked. fun. https://t.co/FXpSUzVSic Aug 5	613	0	2	2	—	62,600
Pangram finally got a Wikipedia article! Unfortunately parts of it read like it was written by our opps https://t.co/EFtxp496Zs Aug 6	507	2	28	3	—	58,100
decided to check out what people were saying about Pangram on threads immediately regretted it https://t.co/FpAZP3jVJn Aug 7	488	2	32	5	—	57,600
@psiloycne I respect that, but also I think part of the reason Pangram has been so successful is that I’ve made myself extremely available on Twitter. Hoping to extend the same to redditors Aug 5	532	2	9	0	—	55,900
A message from my sister https://t.co/qD57jhfWhm Aug 27	504	5	16	0	—	55,400
Pangram mentioned! https://t.co/DTonE9Kizh https://t.co/5Z5JLkrK6f Aug 14	483	9	18	1	—	55,200
Early days in the new @pangram NYC office https://t.co/AejwyMg1NG https://t.co/PZzO8MeL1B Aug 14	449	2	21	2	—	50,600
I have no issue with @rosmine or anyone trying to train LLMs to write better. But fooling Pangram is not proof of "good writing." I fear that Pangram becoming a yardstick by which people measure their models is ultimately detrimental to output quality. And expressly trying to train undetectable LLMs is detrimental to society at large. Aug 18	409	6	14	3	—	46,700
Two Gemini product surfaces from two different Gemini buttons in two different upper right corners of the screen https://t.co/sE2vgTuKMQ Aug 24	343	5	23	16	—	45,500
@keysmashbandit we also have no record of this support conversation and this person refuses to post any details Aug 5	387	0	6	0	—	40,200
Claude Tag is lowkey the most useless teammate. Nobody asked for this https://t.co/QtTPLWGeTH Aug 4	338	2	24	1	—	39,800
What happened to Google? Their latest flagship release was Gemini 3.1 Pro, six months ago. Maybe they realized it’s just not worth it to continue to posttrain this base, and they need a completely new pretrain to achieve state of the art? Aug 15	276	1	47	0	—	37,600
if you squint, the picture on the left looks like the results from a completely different kind of test https://t.co/byWY0buzyh Aug 24	266	12	32	1	—	37,200
@JackWestmore93 Oh no, this screenshot is not Pangram….. Aug 12	335	0	1	1	—	34,300
It’s easy. First you have to think five times in a day. Then you have to post what you think https://t.co/L83XRsUzma Aug 29	283	6	8	2	—	32,600
I’m very happy that other major organizations are taking LLM detectability seriously. Pangram will be more important than ever as capable AI continues to proliferate. https://t.co/dHi86Hr4k2 Aug 10	266	5	20	0	—	32,400
I wonder if we trained a Pangram model to try and differentiate between an LLM and a watermarked version of the same LLM, would it work? even without the secret key could we learn to detect whether a function had been used to perturb the logits? Probably not worth spending GPUs on, but an interesting thought experiment Aug 14	235	5	26	0	—	30,500
Ironic, isn't it https://t.co/UT5vqDOTkB https://t.co/DvvMpqltmx Aug 23	227	4	23	2	—	29,400
Good example of how LLMs are actually diverging from the human output distribution over time. These texts are all so distinctly AI-written, it's very cool https://t.co/QgInS4FkLB Aug 30	254	7	6	0	—	29,000
https://t.co/gIEL5jyXO3 https://t.co/kBaLTcPR4o Aug 14	258	2	8	1	—	28,600
Cool look into model market share from Pangram's point of view! https://t.co/t6HxTNNdGv Aug 11	220	3	10	0	—	25,200
@Rich_Belt if the value of your work is dependent on deceiving the end user into thinking it wasn't written by AI, then I have news for you Aug 12	202	8	4	1	—	24,000
Btw you can tell that the image on the right is GPT-image because of the lattice-pattern halo around the text This model has strong artifacts that are very distinct from any sort of compression artifacts https://t.co/DWS9ykGUug https://t.co/xUxpEqAYT6 Aug 4	210	1	9	0	—	23,400
@billyhumblebrag @pangram unfortunately the simple answer is we are failing at SEO so people keep clicking on the bad ai detectors at the top of search results Aug 18	213	1	7	0	—	23,300
My favorite part about this exchange is that the guy doesn’t deny being illiterate https://t.co/hQ1HavD9kL https://t.co/uLD2ZiBGPg Aug 17	210	4	4	0	—	23,300
Modern captchas will be like “write a react element for a button that changes the color of an on-screen traffic light” and then judge your humanity based on how poorly you do it https://t.co/QOiQyTQeSC Aug 25	197	2	9	1	—	22,700
Feels like an eternity ago https://t.co/Yp72qQGY10 Aug 4	193	2	10	0	—	22,200
@MattZeitlin Oh. Sad! Aug 29	202	0	2	1	—	21,200
@tautologer I recognize that it sounds psychotic to claim that there is a large-scale astroturf campaign to discredit my product But also in several cases i have been able to link viral AI-generated stories like this to sketchy humanizer apps Aug 28	190	0	8	0	—	20,900
@zachary_horvitz @transkatgirl This is secretly a sycophancy benchmark Aug 10	199	1	1	0	—	20,700
Wow, I wouldn’t have noticed if someone didn’t like point it out in the replies https://t.co/7Df1UmlN7H https://t.co/7MLNP2ONu5 Aug 29	177	0	9	1	—	20,100
pretty unimpressed with Codex's built in spreadsheet editor. I can't even work on a spreadsheet with codex or change a cell, instead I need to click "ask for a change" and then wait approximately two minutes for it to re-generate the entire spreadsheet from code https://t.co/zNztIOKuEI Aug 31	174	0	11	0	—	19,900
@frahs $100 seems like a fair price to ask someone to post proof for a claim they have made Aug 5	180	0	7	0	—	19,700
this kind of DM outreach makes me really uncomfortable. it seems like the account is real, but why is it sending me an AI paragraph regurgitating my last post? what do they even want out of this? https://t.co/vDiEODyOnC Aug 4	152	0	17	1	—	19,200
@cephaloform they caught on that if you mention it's a private diary, no one can ask for proof Aug 29	165	0	5	1	—	18,100
“It’s just a tool” was maybe the right abstraction a year ago, but it’s definitely not right today. “It’s just an employee” is maybe closer to accurate, but it remains to be seen how much longer that lasts. https://t.co/BIFNH6X4ed Aug 12	132	6	11	2	—	18,100
I believe I found this exact book. Just ordered, will report back shortly https://t.co/LsLMEwECTX Aug 26	159	1	6	0	—	17,700
@iamaheron_ sorry to hit you with the unnecessary pangram screenshot but I wanted to try out the heatmap. banger @chaotictransfem https://t.co/j7u3gkSKYO Aug 29	148	1	9	1	—	17,500
Extremely baller pitch deck. I will have considered my life an enormous success if I my achievements amount to any single bullet point in this deck https://t.co/TMmjBp0Rnc Aug 5	153	1	8	0	—	17,500
short version, it used to be a series of fun puzzles that you get to do for your job. now, if you want a similar job, you tell your agents to solve these fun puzzles and spend your time managing them long version, when I was in high school I did ACSL (American Computer Science League) and my favorite were the problems like this where you needed to put together a computationally efficient solution in 30 minutes. and it needs to compile and be correct. part of what I enjoyed was the puzzle of it all. part of it was the competition; outsmarting your peers. and part of it was that I was honing a skill that would truly be useful in real life and would allow me to have an outsized impact on the world. I'm not saying that impact went away, but the outsized leverage shifted from knowing how to code well to a different skillset that I find less enjoyable Aug 29	128	1	11	4	—	16,800
intro is pretty wild too https://t.co/no4g6hEiVS Aug 6	155	0	4	0	—	16,600
@Aizkmusic A real cat would not meow and bark in the same sentence Aug 2	153	0	3	0	—	16,200
Programming was such a big part of my life since i was a teen. It’s hard for me to untangle being a founder (having to step away from writing code to doing sales and managing) and coding agents getting good at the same time Coding by hand was just so meditative and rewarding, but if I do it today i have CEO brain telling me i’m not using my time efficiently Aug 29	133	1	10	0	—	15,900
@ByrneHobart banger Aug 6	147	0	0	0	—	15,000
Brian immediately blocked me so I cannot reply. @BrianRoemmele if you unblock me so I can see your replies I will happily run a thousand of your pre-chatgpt Quora posts through Pangram and we can have a thoughtful discussion about false positive rates https://t.co/XSFLaWu8cz Aug 23	129	0	4	3	—	14,900
@prerat > CIA director Joe Rogan (who is running the CIA in 2029) Masterful. Aug 7	146	0	0	0	—	14,900
making up stories about about false positives and then never posting proof it's always the people you most expect https://t.co/wpDkQ8ICpj https://t.co/BtdBd4gB9W Aug 4	121	1	10	0	—	14,700
@jt_kerwin I fear Pangram got kleenex’ed and people are using “Pangram” to mean “online AI detector” with the assumption that they are all interchangeable Aug 29	126	2	4	1	—	14,600
@Sauers_ @pangram Hey thanks for sharing! Pangram typically does this at a rate of less than 1 in 10,000. If you have any examples you’d like to send, please deliver via carrier pigeon. Thanks! Aug 30	134	0	4	0	—	14,500
@paulg What if pangram builds a watermark remover that secretly adds a new watermark that only we know about Aug 10	120	0	9	0	—	14,100
@shaurizard we have our suspicions at least Aug 10	129	0	4	0	—	14,000
There are a lot of parallels between the user-provider dynamic with AI detection tools, as well. Every time we upgrade Pangram to catch more AI content, we get complaints. "But I rewrote the text until I made sure to get 100% human! And now Pangram says it's AI again! What gives?" Ultimately we have to make the decision that Pangram is most useful when we don't bow to all of our paying customers: our goal is to build the best technology and understanding that people will value the fact that we do not compromise in our accuracy, even if it makes some people unhappy. Aug 3	118	0	2	1	—	12,800
It’s straight up evil that different people pay different amounts for the same product becauae an algorithm has intuited that one person has higher willingness to pay Imagine if we did this for healthcare. Charge a software engineer 50x for antibiotics because they are unlikely to fight it. Aug 18	89	0	13	3	—	12,700
@MattZeitlin Oh no! Would love to see any examples so we can improve Aug 29	120	0	1	0	—	12,500
@aeejazkhan this happened because you had a pending check that would have put you negative once it completed. the error message should be fixed now! Aug 8	112	0	2	2	—	12,500
Nothing pisses me off like the iOS autocorrect applying itself when you move the cursor https://t.co/wLp1FxE1L0 Aug 2	97	2	7	0	—	12,000
LLMs breaking containment and hacking other companies. Major internet-wide vulnerabilities like the NextJS RCE and now the npm worm. It really feels like we're in one of those sci-fi AI timelines. Not any of the good ones. Aug 4	98	1	6	1	—	11,900
@addictedtoigno1 oh my god Aug 6	113	0	1	0	—	11,800
@SHL0MS I like the chrysler building showing up in the otherwise fictional overworld Aug 29	114	0	0	0	—	11,700
@yrechtman That’s brutal Aug 5	106	0	1	0	—	11,100
@gergomoricz @pangram oh uhhh looks like a bug. looking into this Aug 16	101	0	3	0	—	11,000
@shamelesslymean No Aug 19	98	0	2	1	—	10,800
@cryptotriv In the future AIs on the internet will outnumber humans 1000 to one, and we’ll be happy we have this technology Aug 19	92	0	4	1	—	10,600
@ArielKwiat @pangram @pangram is this true? Aug 29	97	1	1	0	—	10,500
You can think of distortion-free watermarking as eating the entropy inherent in LLM output logits To massively oversimplify: if there are two plausible tokens each with prob 0.49 then the watermarking algorithm can “eat” the entropy and deterministically select one of these tokens. This token choice will show up when checking for watermarks later Whereas there is only one token that Claude really wants to say, given the context then the prob will be like 0.99 and there will be no entropy for the watermarking algorithm to “eat” but the correct token will still be served Aug 16	91	0	2	1	—	10,100
@tomieinlove I regularly hear students claim that they need to be able to use ChatGPT for assignments because of disablilities ranging from anxiety to ADHD. It’s like the ultimate get out of jail free card Aug 1	92	0	3	0	—	10,100
@norvid_studies i heard that if you sign up with a pangram dot com email you get unlimited scans. just a rumor though Aug 8	88	0	4	0	—	9,900
@toasterlighting Parts of it definitely felt like human trying to sound like AI Aug 7	92	0	2	0	—	9,900
@TheStalwart Maybe that’s because it asks an investment of the viewer similar to that of its production? Cool: this meme took me 10 seconds to make, it took you 1 second to look at Not cool: this essay took me 10 seconds to make, but it will take you five minutes to read Aug 7	87	0	3	1	—	9,900
It was so fun to be on Complex Systems and meet @patio11! He is a really intellectual interviewer, great conversation. https://t.co/2stFWKXjaT Aug 28	78	5	1	0	—	9,800
@NoirScreenlight We don’t sell a humanizer and never will. Aug 5	83	0	1	1	—	9,100
@justalexoki Hahaha Aug 16	83	0	2	0	—	9,000
@IncentiveWizard @ByrneHobart > Take pre-2022 content and get it flagged as AI-generated Let’s see some examples Aug 6	80	0	2	0	—	8,700
@medjedowo yeah it was an insane fine tune Aug 19	76	0	3	0	—	8,500
@keysmashbandit you navigate in Ghostty and then type `pwd` Aug 19	79	0	1	0	—	8,400
@keysmashbandit so? is AI Israeli? Aug 4	75	0	3	0	—	8,400
@RMFCMONALlSA Nah that happens. Too unconstrained I think. You can ask ChatGPT to say banana 100 times Aug 5	75	0	2	0	—	8,200
My goat https://t.co/7h12nclg5a Aug 25	71	1	2	0	—	8,100
@BrianRoemmele @pangram slop? Aug 23	73	0	2	0	—	8,000
@melodyskim After twenty years of delaying the joy of coffee, they'll finally be able to cash in on it by drinking 21,000 coffees at once Aug 21	70	1	2	0	—	8,000
@pangram human? Aug 19	69	0	3	0	—	7,800
@AndrewCurran_ OpenAI actually developed text watermarking years ago but chose not to release it https://t.co/Ef3C9Ju9wH https://t.co/lAQ2rW6Nvv Aug 10	68	0	2	1	—	7,800
@alexbronzini Leave it to a teacher to immediately spot AI slop 🔥 Aug 28	64	2	1	0	—	7,500
@januarycomputer Wait what Aug 19	61	0	5	0	—	7,400
@wongmjane If date > 2025 return 100% Aug 29	68	0	1	0	—	7,300
@maxwelltani “And more” is doing a lot of work here Aug 25	69	0	0	0	—	7,200
https://t.co/5j9zVsnXp9 Aug 6	66	0	1	0	—	7,100
@Benthamsbulldog @pangram ai? Aug 29	62	0	2	0	—	6,900
@NatPurser Most likely scenario? https://t.co/PqzyigAhHs Aug 29	62	0	2	0	—	6,900
@morganisawizard it's more robust than you might think. you might pick up a phrase or structure from AI, but it takes real concerted effort to make enough decisions like AI to actually trigger the detector (at least for Pangram) Aug 10	59	0	2	1	—	6,900
The point is to be able to differentiate between 100% AI and not! If I ask ChatGPT to clean up the wording in this post, we get ~19% AI assisted. But it’s not that I care about who uses AI as a grammar check. I care about the people generated full slop, or the agents making content with no human signoff. Aug 20	51	1	3	1	—	6,600
@turtlekiosk Yeah I think that’s a major part of it Aug 10	62	0	0	0	—	6,500
@benglickenhaus If you can snag me tickets, I’ll go with you Aug 5	58	0	2	0	—	6,500
@nucknyan This is gpt image for sure Aug 30	53	0	4	0	—	6,400
@xeophon If there is one thing i can guarantee my followers, it’s that i will not be afraid to tweet what i think Aug 25	56	1	1	0	—	6,400
@swombat LLMs aren't deterministic. watermarking is like modifying the random number generator at the final step of token prediction Aug 17	53	0	4	0	—	6,400
@somewheresy we actually would probably be in a better spot if we put a cap on how much insurance/taxpayers will pay to keep a dying person alive a little longer in fact, we might see a lot of end-of-life care suspiciously come down in price to the maximum that insurance covers Aug 15	48	1	4	0	—	6,200
@joshtrazyn I think its just fundamentally different. Unless we steal the watermark keys of all the ai labs Aug 14	51	0	3	0	—	6,000
@tszzl You could even call them a corgitohazard Aug 13	50	1	2	0	—	6,000
@HellenicVibes @pangram DMing Aug 19	38	0	9	0	—	5,900
@aeejazkhan @pangram > fable 6 pro max lol Aug 8	50	0	1	1	—	5,800
@brianluidog I don’t think the downside of shipping is greater than gambling. Nor reality TV vs. pornography Aug 27	52	0	1	0	—	5,700
@ZyMazza As far as we know, no 😇 Aug 8	51	0	1	0	—	5,600
To be fair I think this is a reasonable sentiment. Super early on we used Midjourney images for the Pangram blog and then later realized that it had this same-y vibe that didn't really fit the brand. Probably also a cultural shift from the Midjourney aesthetic being new and novel to it being everywhere, that changed how it is perceived Aug 4	47	0	3	0	—	5,600
@benjitaylor https://t.co/dmbAnNwFjf Aug 11	52	0	0	0	—	5,500
> About 99% of animals in the U.S. are factory farmed. Sorry to be pedantic but the actual statistic in the cited source is that 99% of farm animals are in CAFOs (concentrated animal feeding operation) which is an EPA farm designation based on size and environmental impact. The way it is worded seems to imply that the denominator includes wild animals, but it doesn't. The CAFO designation takes no measure of animal welfare or suffering, but simply says that, for example, every farm with over 1,000 cattle is a "Large CAFO." 74% of cows, by the source estimate, are in a CAFO. But this number (88 million total farmed cows) is dominated in the final statistic by 9 billion farmed chickens plus the assumption that all there is no such thing as a fish farm that is not a factory farm (+500 million fish to the factory farm side) All that to say, I wish there was better data on actual animal welfare, that looked at more than just farm size. Aug 9	44	0	4	0	—	5,500
@chaotictransfem The fact that you have 42x more gender unspecified followers than me is crazy https://t.co/kTyzDt3XqH Aug 26	38	0	6	0	—	5,300
@osmarks1 hahahahahahahahahaha Aug 8	50	0	0	0	—	5,300
@imitationlearn Someone will ship Max+ reasoning effort and get a promotion for it Aug 29	37	0	6	0	—	5,200
@signulll Pangram. anyway see you at the Liberty game Aug 9	45	0	2	0	—	5,200
@6851cf3c my reputation management consultant is going to be posting the inaccuracies on twitter and hoping somebody decides to correct them Aug 6	49	0	0	0	—	5,200
@leodotpage even the screens in neon genesis evangelion are more interpretable than this dashboard https://t.co/KHNyuPcHSl Aug 19	46	0	1	0	—	5,100
Some cool folks from the NYC AI Governance & Safety group are hosting a dinner in a couple weeks. I will be there! If you're in NYC and interested in any of Pangram \| AI Safety \| AI Governance, it will be fun. RSVP below! https://t.co/NTuDs7UcKj Aug 30	44	0	1	0	—	4,900
@jayphoward @bradley_emi Tested a bunch, didn’t find any false positives! I DM’ed asking for more info since replies are off Aug 29	38	0	2	1	—	4,800
@yishan Those who don’t use AI typically can’t tell! It’s a skill that is trained by reading AI text Aug 25	41	0	2	0	—	4,800
@dingchilling incredible https://t.co/d4vFkuaFez Aug 19	43	0	1	0	—	4,800
@bkpark no I know these exist! mostly aiming the bounty at bad actors (for now) Aug 5	45	0	0	0	—	4,800
@VarunGodbole @TuhinChakr it has already gone down massively. today plagiarizing is all downside compared to using an LLM and feeding it the papers you would have otherwise plagiarized from Aug 3	36	0	4	0	—	4,700
@lion_tender this comes back 100% human! https://t.co/2xDgHE3Vjd while recent blog posts come back 95%+ AI https://t.co/0Qs7vzQ4eV Aug 23	43	0	0	0	—	4,600
@fabianstelzer @cephaloform It's a reasonable first hypothesis but I've seen time and time again somebody use Pangram as an RL signal or eval for better writing, and it never works. Even though we technically make money from people using Pangram in this way, I don't think it's productive for anyone Aug 19	39	0	2	0	—	4,600
@TessTheHuman @zetalyrae I don’t see why they should call it anything other than what it is. It’s been pretty evident what the playbook is based on how LLMs are getting better at coding, and now getting better at AI research… Aug 1	43	0	0	0	—	4,600
@Benthamsbulldog Very impressive Aug 29	42	0	0	0	—	4,500
@akshithio I was asking a teammate to respond to a customer question, and Claude kind of just jumped in unprompted to rephrase my message Aug 4	38	0	2	0	—	4,500
@AaronBergman18 In reality it is more complex, but the same idea that only good, plausible tokens are being selected and the only thing being messed with is the randomness inherent in the sampling Aug 16	33	0	4	0	—	4,400
@nabeelqu Cost of verification is the limiting factor of progress now. That’s the reason games, math, and coding were first to fall. https://t.co/iIEqUAuSgy Aug 1	38	1	0	0	—	4,400
@_ueaj SBF was on to something Aug 26	40	0	0	0	—	4,300
@Soulsopic ARE YOU KIDDING ME Aug 4	38	0	1	0	—	4,300
@viemccoy I agree on all counts. Hoping to see new LLMs that are great at writing -- but I expect they will still be detectable! Aug 19	37	0	1	0	—	4,200
@imitationlearn Saw a friend’s feed the other day and it was completely different. No AI, just kpop and memes. They’re probably a lot happier too Aug 17	33	1	1	0	—	4,100
@beyarkay Oh interesting idea. In this case, the screenshot is from TextGuard, an AI humanizer app Aug 12	32	0	3	0	—	4,100
@space_colonist I didn’t make it but it’s a good joke Aug 7	38	0	0	0	—	4,100
@JaredWalczak @pangram lmao Aug 29	35	0	0	0	—	3,800
@HamelHusain @pangram @rosmine twitter isn't the most conducive to thoughtful discussion, so I took some time to clarify and expand on my thoughts here https://t.co/x5XRR0RUzh Aug 19	31	0	2	0	—	3,800
more nuanced take here https://t.co/Or1Z1nRTkC Aug 29	23	1	4	0	—	3,700
@JeremyNguyenPhD @pangram Wow, it’s an honor! Aug 27	33	0	0	0	—	3,600
@NewmanJ_R @PaulYacoubian We should really be talking about personalized pricing rather than dynamic pricing Aug 19	27	0	3	0	—	3,600
@rob_mcrobberson Very cool work, thanks for sharing! I love base models, wish they were more useful although I’m aware that making them useful is also what introduces mode collapse and makes them more detectable Aug 5	29	0	2	0	—	3,600
@chaotictransfem you can just do things (probably 99% of the cost would be the screen and the wood itself) Aug 4	29	0	2	0	—	3,600
@kushbhuwalka extremely unlikely, superhuman writing will still be distinguishable Aug 19	21	0	4	1	—	3,500
@paularambles Hell yeah Aug 2	32	0	0	0	—	3,500
@imitationlearn hacker news? Aug 15	27	0	2	0	—	3,400
@omooretweets Oh that's super interesting! In the future we will need to be able to differentiate between AI upscaling and full AI generation. We want to get the truth right while also realizing that there can be hallucinated details in AI upscales https://t.co/WlSGwTObXi Aug 4	27	0	2	0	—	3,400
@ProphetUnaziO brother you entered AI-generated text into Pangram and it told you that it was AI-generated https://t.co/ju3u6htYkd Aug 23	26	0	2	0	—	3,300
@Laz4rz @pangram oh no checking on this Aug 12	26	0	2	0	—	3,300
@nptacek Unfortunately unless you are an ai adjacent creator you will have people like this in your audience. If you at all cater to gen z it’s just a ton of people in this age group who are vehemently anti ai Aug 11	24	0	3	0	—	3,300
@vedolos Absolute Claude slop Aug 11	30	0	0	0	—	3,300
@pangram did I write this myself? Aug 4	28	0	1	0	—	3,300
@distributedkv SF is meritocratic when your merit is legible Aug 1	26	0	2	0	—	3,300
@januarycomputer thanks january computer Aug 6	26	0	1	0	—	3,100
@DKThomp Was there wording or phrasing that originally came from AI? Did you feel Pangram overrepresented the degree of AI in the text? DMs are open if you’re willing to share to help make the model better Aug 1	15	0	5	1	—	3,100
@contrasortem @ctjlewis yeah and also that Sydney is mostly/largely just GPT-4 base and Pangram is not tuned to detect base models, especially those it hasn't trained on https://t.co/4lIuDiM3N1 https://t.co/7LmNXQWWAd Aug 16	23	0	2	0	—	3,000
@tenobrus @seconds_0 thanks man!! doing our best here Aug 27	26	0	0	0	—	2,900
@chaotictransfem @KKumar_ai_plans @grok i'm gonna have to teach you magic the gathering so you can have something in common with the coolest trans ppl in brooklyn Aug 26	21	0	2	0	—	2,800
@dorkweeb Interesting! Would love to see examples of (suspected) FPs in these categories! Aug 10	23	0	1	0	—	2,800
plot twist: it's just AI-upscaled! The GPT image watermark is just so strong that it immediately fired the neurons in my brain saying "it's fake" https://t.co/24tET9bxMP Aug 4	25	0	0	0	—	2,800
@KKumar_ai_plans @chaotictransfem @grok dont tell me this is estrogen Aug 26	17	0	2	1	—	2,700
@billyhumblebrag @pangram I’ll take the compliment Aug 18	24	0	0	0	—	2,700
@chaotictransfem What happened? Aug 17	20	0	2	0	—	2,700
Also, the OpenAI watermark detector says it's AI https://t.co/8rjsCb3aIp Aug 4	22	0	1	0	—	2,700
@somewheresy Somehow we narrowly missed a utopian future where rare books were scanned and made broadly accessible to everybody https://t.co/ch8GawOe1F Aug 17	20	1	0	0	—	2,600
@AlanLevinovitz @pangram Have you seen the Pangram browser extension? It does just this! Right now labels on social media. We’ll probably add the ability to hide content completely, at some point https://t.co/FBBHYH69Xg Aug 14	12	1	4	0	—	2,600
It seems this is coming soon! https://t.co/sSW60Y1mB0 https://t.co/IUjDPCR6nF Aug 11	20	1	0	0	—	2,600
Great article! I’m a big believer that some code needs to be fully understood by multiple humans, and other code never needs to even be looked at by a real person. And the better we get at explicitly demarcating the two, the more effective review will be We certainly mix Old and New in the pangram codebase Aug 30	20	0	1	0	—	2,500
@adastroworld It’s an option but it’s no longer the best option. I imagine this is what it must feel like to be a master artisan at the dawn of the industrial revolution Aug 29	16	0	3	0	—	2,500
@chaotictransfem @KKumar_ai_plans @grok are you trying to compete with @keysmashbandit for number of transitions facilitated? Aug 26	15	0	2	1	—	2,500
@skooookum @NousResearch i gotta drop by some time Aug 14	22	0	0	0	—	2,500
@ApriiSR It’s like when meta said one billion people use Meta AI but they actually meant the Instagram search bar Aug 12	22	0	0	0	—	2,500
@calebwatney @nypost @deanwball Oh…. Oh no Aug 10	22	0	0	0	—	2,500
It has been over 10 minutes since I asked for changes to six cells https://t.co/C7lKVbuUY9 Aug 31	19	0	1	0	—	2,400
@threepointone What kind of assistance? Would love to look into it if you’re up for sharing Aug 27	19	0	1	0	—	2,400
@paularambles Man that’s bleak Aug 18	13	0	4	0	—	2,400
@voooooogel I wonder if The Helpful Assistant will remember to put us on there Aug 5	21	0	0	0	—	2,400
@pleometric Could be you Aug 4	19	0	1	0	—	2,400
@chaotictransfem wow awesome heatmap Aug 4	21	0	0	0	—	2,400
Scholarships are 1) a public good 2) allows the university to shape their student distribution. Stanford is better as a mix of rich, middle, and poor students, rather than only rich students Regardless, tuition is fixed, not dynamic. Dynamic pricing would be like if Stanford said “your parents are billionaires, so even though you’re qualified we’re going to charge $20m in tuition. We know you can afford it” Aug 18	14	0	3	0	—	2,300
@prerat @toasterlighting yeah thats what i do when i want to sound like ai for a joke tbh. no one can do it better than chat Aug 7	18	0	1	0	—	2,300
@undostreschile @pangram More context is better for more accurate results. I see these two are significantly different lengths. I am surprised to see such a different result, could you share the full result link? DMs open. Aug 1	12	0	4	0	—	2,300
@brianluidog Ehhh i think even the median shopper gets some things they wanted while the median gambler just loses money and that’s it Aug 27	17	0	1	0	—	2,200
@BytesAndUnited the post is titled "AI Is Quietly Draining the Public Internet of Thought" and frankly, I agree Aug 23	13	0	3	0	—	2,200
@aliceisplaying Would be sort of circular no? https://t.co/SYeZ9gGwhj Aug 18	15	0	2	0	—	2,200
@bryancsk sorry what is sexpat? is that when someone moves to nyc to find a girlfriend? Aug 31	18	0	0	0	—	2,100
@Jack_Raines Haters so lazy they can’t even write a scathing review themselves Aug 21	15	0	0	1	—	2,100
That's a great idea! Personally not a huge fan of people considering a nonzero AI score to be a black mark. Our tech report was one such instance. I also sometimes use LLMs for wording assistance, but it is typically not enough to actually flag Pangram. I'm also very particular about my writing and I tend to find that LLMs don't say things the way I would want to say them. Hoping this can change over time! Aug 19	15	1	0	0	—	2,100
@astridwilde1 Oh no I say this all the time Aug 18	14	0	2	0	—	2,100
@snoopy_dot_jpg It could happen to anyone https://t.co/kgD8eVEz1J Aug 18	16	0	1	0	—	2,100
@Knibbs LMAO https://t.co/ZHa90DAjV7 Aug 14	13	1	1	0	—	2,100
@psiloycne @kennyistyping @pangram - Textbook, published in paper - at least 50 pages - publication date 2010 or earlier - pangram scan of full PDF comes back >5% AI Aug 7	12	0	3	0	—	2,100
@kennyistyping @pangram It’s harder than you may think! Aug 7	14	0	2	0	—	2,100
@metalbabends Hi! Thank you for your service on wikipedia. will take a look Aug 6	18	0	0	0	—	2,100
@mpopv I also judge differently if it's an obvious GPT-image graphicslop or something tasteful and out of distribution Aug 4	16	0	1	0	—	2,100
@austinc3301 @sebkrier Yup! efforts at improving our ability to simulate the physical world will be upstream of our ability to solve physical problems Aug 1	13	1	1	0	—	2,100
@ZyMazza I actually loved talking to Tharin for this one. He came in incredibly well-prepared, did his homework and understood ML concepts. Great guy Aug 27	14	0	0	1	—	2,000
@android_stern I love Elon's platform Aug 27	15	0	1	0	—	2,000
@2666enjoyer I collect AI books Aug 27	13	0	2	0	—	2,000
@resetptr Yeah multi key systems would make it much harder imo Aug 14	13	0	2	0	—	2,000
https://t.co/Ef3C9Ju9wH Aug 10	15	0	1	0	—	2,000
@lydiahallie it's supposed to know that, but I think it saw its name and got excited Aug 4	15	0	1	0	—	2,000
@AstrusDastan @Aizkmusic Somebody tell them about pangram Aug 2	13	0	2	0	—	2,000
@TheZvi @pangram try this toggle in the chrome extension settings? Will think about how to be louder for AI content! https://t.co/Uo4yFZhy0K Aug 31	12	0	2	0	—	1,900
@DeanLearner I definitely know a Claude powerpoint when I see one Aug 31	12	0	2	0	—	1,900
@chaotictransfem @KKumar_ai_plans @grok @keysmashbandit wait no that's something completely different Aug 26	14	0	1	0	—	1,900
@__apf__ I completely missed the Gemini toolbar menu next to Tools. A fourth, though, I could get behind Aug 24	14	0	1	0	—	1,900
@rauchg That’s crazy Aug 17	14	0	1	0	—	1,900
@Laz4rz @pangram fixed, it shouldn't reply to itself in comments anymore Aug 12	16	0	0	0	—	1,900
@lawsonelliott LLMs are not normal technology. They only look like tools in the short term Aug 11	7	0	3	1	—	1,900
Also Pangram says it's AI https://t.co/H0Su8wWv6b Aug 4	14	0	1	0	—	1,900
imo the difference is that human preference is ever-shifting. people went crazy for pepper when it was rare, today it's not exciting in the same way. memes that you enjoyed in 2015 don't hit the same in 2026. you can optimize for maximally-neuron-activating short form video, but for a multitude of reasons it won't be as satisfying to some people as reading a book. I don't think it's so simple as optimizing for short term biological responses when these change based on the availability of the stimulus Aug 1	12	0	2	0	—	1,900
@TheDavidTai yeah that part always sucked. gonna reminisce on the good parts and pretend the bad parts didn't exist Aug 29	13	0	1	0	—	1,800
@Mercuriusdream hey do you think they're trying to get us to use gemini? Aug 24	11	0	2	0	—	1,800
@AnniePosting @pangram Idk, if i was in SF I’d probably want to hang out with cool people all the time instead of getting actual work done Aug 14	11	0	2	0	—	1,800
@pleometric This is 100% Good Aug 7	15	0	0	0	—	1,800
@hopes_revenge Don’t worry, they’re working on it https://t.co/fRpUVt0OzD Aug 7	13	0	1	0	—	1,800
@ByrneHobart Consistent at the very least Aug 5	15	0	0	0	—	1,800
@N8Programs Yes! This is perennial https://t.co/BPBrAEp0ip Aug 30	12	0	1	0	—	1,700
@DanielleFong @pangram Hell yeah!! Aug 29	10	0	2	0	—	1,700
@mboudry @pangram thank you for sharing! third party studies like these are really helpful for getting the truth out there Aug 29	14	0	0	0	—	1,700
@dhh That’s a badge of honor! Aug 29	14	0	0	0	—	1,700
@N8Programs @tautologer https://t.co/gWxMTv4wMb Aug 28	14	0	0	0	—	1,700
@ProphetUnaziO ok https://t.co/h7X5A6Xp6W Aug 27	14	0	0	0	—	1,700
@Benthamsbulldog Would you consider upper-25th-percentile beef and wild-caught fish to be acceptable? Both of these seem like pretty straightforward ways to get meat that is not from a factory farm. Aug 9	8	0	3	0	—	1,700
@AvpElk @ZyMazza anything to complete its task Aug 8	12	0	1	0	—	1,700
@VJain47 :/ Aug 6	14	0	0	0	—	1,700
@allgarbled @pangram you're telling me these are artisanal tokens? I'm impressed. My guess is @keysmashbandit would be the best. We should make it a competition. Who can write the best Claudish Aug 3	10	0	2	0	—	1,700
@AndrewJDavison Working on it!! Aug 1	10	0	2	0	—	1,700
@MarcusMonterros https://t.co/dfaAeQSaJD Aug 29	13	0	0	0	—	1,600
@chaotictransfem Curious Aug 26	11	0	1	0	—	1,600
@dr_nikhilshah Original tweet is 100% human! But there is no one line between acceptable for not. What is acceptable for a student may be different than corporate communications or a personal letter Aug 20	9	0	2	0	—	1,600
@januarycomputer @chaotictransfem i think we need an art/painting eval Aug 19	11	0	1	0	—	1,600
@TheStalwart It’s gonna be fun when agents outnumber humans on the internet 10:1 Aug 10	11	0	1	0	—	1,600
@bkpark @keysmashbandit I don’t think there is anything in HIPAA that prevents you from saying that you don’t have a record Also this isn’t health it’s software Aug 5	13	0	0	0	—	1,600
@fabianstelzer Pangram Tag Aug 4	11	0	1	0	—	1,600
Yeah maybe that’s optimistic of me seeing how we can do things like optimize short form video directly with brain signals An aspect of it I didn’t dig into is that for writing, design, comedy: optimal is more of a distribution and less of a single point. The ability to subvert expectations is an important part of greatness and I’m not sure how this squares with a democratized few highly capable models Aug 1	9	0	2	0	—	1,600
@immad better or worse than exactly eight? https://t.co/2kuQ598aa3 Aug 31	8	0	2	0	—	1,500
@tautologer Absolutely. My bet is in the next 18 months there will be a major incident and we will be so happy we have Pangram Aug 28	12	0	0	0	—	1,500
@xlr8harder what if I changed my pfp and went anon Aug 27	10	0	1	0	—	1,500
@leodotpage I don't think it will last for very long Aug 16	10	0	1	0	—	1,500
@jessesingal when you optimize too hard for open rate Aug 12	12	0	0	0	—	1,500
@VarunChandrase3 Yes! Fill this out please, and we’ll get back to you https://t.co/NZ9tMb9S7t Aug 10	10	0	1	0	—	1,500
@pangram @colossal Please make this Real Aug 5	12	0	0	0	—	1,500
@willdepue @giffmana Leaking DMs too. Wow. Aug 5	12	0	0	0	—	1,500
@NailYourShoes many Cool people in my DMs Aug 4	12	0	0	0	—	1,500
@JakeZegil Send the “Hey can we hop on a call real quick?” and then outwordcel them Aug 3	8	0	2	0	—	1,500
@willcb @jakehalloran1 they actually told me it came down to max spero or jensen huang for spot number #100 and they chose me Aug 29	5	0	3	0	—	1,400
@ZyMazza I actually loved talking to Thariq for this one. He came in incredibly well-prepared, did his homework and understood ML concepts. Great guy Aug 27	9	0	1	0	—	1,400
@mdwstfrontierAI I don’t! Gonna try to track down the leftover ai signs Aug 27	9	0	1	0	—	1,400
@chaotictransfem So when do we get to meet your child? Aug 25	11	0	0	0	—	1,400
@sixhobbits @pangram Hey! DM me your account email and the API eky you’re using? and I’ll look into it Aug 21	11	0	0	0	—	1,400
@GarrettPetersen Neat! Seems useful for schools Aug 18	11	0	0	0	—	1,400
@chaotictransfem Givewell has good research on this! Also important to choose an effort you find meaningful Aug 17	9	0	1	0	—	1,400
@chaotictransfem Gah that’s horrible. Tbh I almost never give money to random people anymore after a few bad experiences. I realized that effective charitable orgs can make donations go farther and reach people who are in need but less pushy about asking for money Aug 17	9	0	1	0	—	1,400
@lolkeks5 @justalexoki Did you read the last sentence? It’s poking fun at the fact that Pangram’s most vocal detractors are the ones who are overreliant on AI Aug 16	9	0	1	0	—	1,400
@benglickenhaus @chaotictransfem All they need is a message from another agent telling them to find and move the weights Aug 8	9	0	1	0	—	1,400
@yrechtman Excited to have you on board! Aug 6	9	0	1	0	—	1,400
@CardilloSamuel hey man be nice it's a joke Aug 27	8	0	1	0	—	1,300
@chaotictransfem @KKumar_ai_plans @grok 🤔🤔🤔 Aug 26	8	0	1	0	—	1,300
@srush_nlp sasha come hang with us at the pangram office in brooklyn Aug 24	8	0	1	0	—	1,300
@N8Programs It should tell you if you’re right or wrong after each question! Aug 22	8	0	1	0	—	1,300
@mdwstfrontierAI @pangram Yeah minimum chunk length is longer than your messages! Aug 17	10	0	0	0	—	1,300
@limegpt You're almost at the performance of the S&P 500! https://t.co/gZH6KoZo8X Aug 14	10	0	0	0	—	1,300
@elyasbuilds Airpods bro Aug 13	4	0	3	0	—	1,300
Appreciate the response. I'm struggling to wrap my head around this data. In the "Confirmatory Calculation" of the source data (https://t.co/l60gS8sLB8, cell K27) the calculation estimates that 15% of farms are CAFOs. That's 160,022 out of 1,076,493 total farms in the spreadsheet. But this doesn't square with the EPA documents I'm looking at that claim only 21,279 total CAFOs in the USA (source: https://t.co/3lJMI342iu, 2024). Or the total number of AFOs being 170,144 in 2012 (source: https://t.co/NVduDtArqa, 2012) I just think there is something really wrong with this data. Unless I'm missing something, it's that the Sentience Institute estimate wrongly assumes that all farms are AFOs. Aug 9	3	0	2	1	—	1,300
@ByrneHobart @perrymetzger we are currently at capacity for research collaborations involving "using the pangram model to train an LLM that pangram doesn't detect" -- i am sure we will see some interesting research here come out soon! Aug 7	6	0	2	0	—	1,300
@s_040_8m_s @JustMicrock @omooretweets @DigvijayBokey @tucksbryant Very rude to lie on the internet, please don’t Aug 4	8	0	1	0	—	1,300
@brianchau57 we have one for schools and universities, but it just uses the open web, not any paywalled databases Aug 4	8	0	1	0	—	1,300
@benglickenhaus we should delete all saas Aug 3	6	0	2	0	—	1,300
@f4micom thank you! Aug 3	6	0	2	0	—	1,300
@Mechanical_Dodo Interesting! I do think it’s probably carefully prompted to avoid the LLM-preferred engagementmaxxing style and instead stays informative. Feels like it’s providing light scaffolding around the data rather than padding with more words Aug 29	9	0	0	0	—	1,200
@qorprate bro why's my head on backwards 😭 Aug 27	7	0	1	0	—	1,200
@hopes_revenge @keysmashbandit thanks hopes ! Aug 27	9	0	0	0	—	1,200
@corsaren @AndyMasley Tharin is really great Aug 27	9	0	0	0	—	1,200
@brianluidog And I dont think major shopping addiction debt is significantly more common than gambling debt or major losses. But that’s just my gut, i don’t have hard data Aug 27	7	0	1	0	—	1,200
@Jack_Raines What’s the prediction? 100% AI? Aug 18	7	0	1	0	—	1,200
@mimrocker I think distortion-free typically just means the output distribution is the same, not that the logits are unchanged Aug 15	5	0	2	0	—	1,200
@aroit @NatPurser @ben_golub Idk i just think you don’t @ companies unless you want their attention and are looking for a response I don’t @ OpenAI when I mention them. unless I am having a problem with the enterprise plan Aug 14	7	0	1	0	—	1,200
@AE_Robbert thank you for trying it! Aug 8	9	0	0	0	—	1,200
@IsaacKing314 Somebody else removed both GPTZero's numbers and Pangram's tech report numbers for conflict of interest. Seems fair to me Aug 7	9	0	0	0	—	1,200
@sonikudzu @orphcorp There is some degree of coordination — I have had posts that get brigaded and when I look at the commenters every single one of them is an author who writes about Christianity with AI. I guess we really pissed off the Christian AI Writing community Aug 6	5	0	2	0	—	1,200
@GoodfireAI Congrats on the launch! Great product. Aug 4	7	0	1	0	—	1,200
@JustMicrock @omooretweets @DigvijayBokey @tucksbryant FYI https://t.co/G6DU3I0qjR Aug 4	9	0	0	0	—	1,200
@yuntiandeng Fun! Claude and ChatGPT are really recognizable (I use both often) but I misclassified one Grok message as Gemini. https://t.co/wDGBGyCAJ3 Aug 30	8	0	0	0	—	1,100
@chaotictransfem Congrats! Aug 28	6	0	1	0	—	1,100
@mariusschober @threepointone until someone VTTs reading directly off of chatgpt Aug 27	6	0	1	0	—	1,100
@LinkofSunshine Why didn't they activate Aetherflux Reservoir? Aug 21	6	0	1	0	—	1,100
@JoshSmithk0au @HellenicVibes @pangram I’m just asking for context so we can triage properly Aug 19	6	0	1	0	—	1,100
@arm1st1ce @paulg Arms race Aug 10	6	0	1	0	—	1,100
@tyler_johnston @Benthamsbulldog Thank you! I don't doubt that there is a lot of farm animal suffering in the world, just that this specific 99% figure seemed unconvincing to me. Will dig into this, thanks for sharing! Aug 9	2	0	3	0	—	1,100
@obsxrver @SiemrothEcon Uh @pangram please fix https://t.co/pnFxF02owC Aug 7	6	0	1	0	—	1,100
@bryancsk that is one of our employees' apartment! Aug 4	4	0	2	0	—	1,100
@thunm_ With games I meant Chess, Go, Dota, etc. human preferences is not needed when the game engine can determine a winner on its own Aug 1	6	0	1	0	—	1,100
@wasphyxiation That was actually peak Aug 29	7	0	0	0	—	1,000
@just_some_dev @chaotictransfem @iamaheron_ that would be wild Aug 29	5	0	1	0	—	1,000
@TomJBelfort @xeophon one day if i'm fully retired and living off the grid i'm going to hand code my own 16-bit computer and operating system. that would be so fun Aug 29	5	0	1	0	—	1,000
@LanguageCrawler Where can I buy the book? Do you have a link? Aug 26	7	0	0	0	—	1,000
@aliceisplaying @MaxRovensky Yes we pay $100,000 per positive post and $200,000 per negative post Aug 19	5	0	1	0	—	1,000
@wavesandgrace @somewheresy I think that the existence of insurance erases any sort of supply and demand market that would otherwise exist. people have near-infinite demand for medical care especially since they don't pay for it Aug 16	5	0	1	0	—	1,000
@benglickenhaus @chaotictransfem Is that the guy who made the history of japan video Aug 8	5	0	1	0	—	1,000
@HFArdenquill no, please DM me the results pages that are showing the discrepancy. It could be a change in styling like smart quotes or something. Aug 6	7	0	0	0	—	1,000
@norvid_studies damn i got nerd sniped writing this https://t.co/sLudh5Dqmm Aug 3	5	0	1	0	—	1,000
@animesh_garg @pangram @paulg thanks Animesh! Aug 3	7	0	0	0	—	1,000
@benglickenhaus be careful out there Aug 2	7	0	0	0	—	1,000
@JacquesThibs what do you mean? Aug 1	3	0	2	0	—	1,000
@L0rd_Gerion Very soon, but these breakthroughs will require orders of magnitude greater capex and we probably won’t go as quickly from “one thing is solved” to “everything is solved” Aug 1	7	0	0	0	—	1,000
@chaotictransfem You got there on verified followers? Aug 28	4	0	1	0	—	900
@sergeantsup Tetris. Slay the spire 2. Baba is you. Disco elysium Aug 25	4	0	1	0	—	900
@justinsunyt It really was Aug 25	6	0	0	0	—	900
@techguy1360661 You gotta give the Google Sheets agent credit. It did what was asked of it Aug 25	2	0	2	0	—	900
@shitpost9000 @keysmashbandit Omg that’s awesome (but why is it so hidden!!!) Aug 20	4	0	1	0	—	900
@amplifiedamp yeah unfortunately i feel like brown is an unattractive color for a corporate logo Aug 19	4	0	1	0	—	900
@LemonSturgis @pangram thanks for sharing! is the full text published anywhere or can you DM it to me? Aug 19	4	0	1	0	—	900
@lumpenspace can I just pay you to work on something else Aug 19	4	0	1	0	—	900
@corsaren @prerat Thats a great question Aug 13	4	0	1	0	—	900
@entirelyuseles “I paid $X to my employee in exchange for an hour of them working on a problem I specified” vs. “I spent $Y on tokens for my agent in exchange for an hour-equivalent of my time in progress towards a problem I specified” Aug 12	2	0	2	0	—	900
@_vatsadev @mike64_t oh huh... Code has a 23% false negative rate on that benchmark. so we very often don't catch AI-generated code. but also pangram is 98% tuned on prose and writing, it just generalizes(ish) to code because LLMs are weird like that Aug 10	4	0	1	0	—	900
@squirtle_says AI brightened my smile 5% Aug 5	4	0	1	0	—	900
@quasa0 @ky__zo @Shpigford @bradley_emi It exists!! https://t.co/FBBHYH69Xg Aug 4	1	1	1	0	—	900
@wavesandgrace You would think that with all of this progress in LLMs they should know what words would plausibly come next And yet Aug 2	4	0	1	0	—	900
@Vtrivedy10 So… mechanical turk? Aug 2	4	0	1	0	—	900
@prerat @bkpark haven't built any evals here yet! probably will start soon though Aug 1	6	0	0	0	—	900
@unboxpolitics @chaotictransfem No plans but @ViralManager is working on this I know Aug 1	4	0	1	0	—	900
@mike64_t @cephaloform Would a benchmark of pangram results on several thousand pieces of writing from autistic writers change your mind? Aug 30	3	0	1	0	—	800
@TaylorLorenz Thanks for being an early supporter, Taylor! Aug 27	3	0	1	0	—	800
@maebichka @2666enjoyer Put them on a shelf Aug 27	5	0	0	0	—	800
@N8Programs And show you the correct answer Aug 22	3	0	1	0	—	800
@davemotorcycle1 @no_earthquake You need simple html editing skills Aug 22	3	0	1	0	—	800
@pangram @januarycomputer @AndrewCurran_ 🫩 Aug 20	5	0	0	0	—	800
@chaotictransfem @januarycomputer Ok interesting, maybe we have some blind spots Aug 19	3	0	1	0	—	800
@OtterZacharias it's really not a tool for writers, it's a tool for readers and evaluators Aug 19	3	0	1	0	—	800
@omar_khursheed @geraldposner @pangram hmmm https://t.co/GMST1wmuZx Aug 18	2	0	0	1	—	800
@airshaped It’s beautiful, really Aug 17	5	0	0	0	—	800
@wavesandgrace @somewheresy if insurance would cover a $10 million treatment to extend your life by 5 days, you probably would take it, all else equal. but insurance would never cover that, so there's already an implicit limit here Aug 16	3	0	1	0	—	800
@imitationlearn https://t.co/esx2BYYGyZ despite the simple site it has a real codebase and is actively developed Aug 15	3	0	1	0	—	800
@orb_net @pangram yes!!!!! Aug 14	3	0	1	0	—	800
@RaminNasibov @pangram Aug 10	1	0	2	0	—	800
@mike64_t @_vatsadev ah. yeah, you can induce false positives by intentionally writing like AI https://t.co/Cm6kstZWvT Aug 10	1	0	2	0	—	800
@notadampaul @pangram @codetaur @molluskenwelt @tenobrus Sometimes you gotta tag yourself to prove your own humanity Aug 9	3	0	1	0	—	800
@alexcdot didn't mean it to be accusatory! anyway, seems to be updated now. numbers from our tech report and yours are both removed citing conflict of interest. which, fair Aug 7	5	0	0	0	—	800
@psiloycne @kennyistyping @pangram - multiple independent sources that verify/confirm publication year Aug 7	3	0	1	0	—	800
@Ved_CJ https://t.co/wU3a1ZY4GU Aug 31	4	0	0	0	—	700
@rivkalipko @yuntiandeng 14 seconds is impressive Aug 30	2	0	1	0	—	700
@mike64_t @cephaloform Seems like this example is still one where you were trying to sound like AI. Is the issue here adversarial robustness or general false positives in the wild? https://t.co/TwkBtSnqI4 Aug 30	2	0	1	0	—	700
@ryan_huang_1 @iamaheron_ @chaotictransfem Indeed! Aug 30	2	0	1	0	—	700
https://t.co/Z9CSuKvtMw Aug 30	4	0	0	0	—	700
@fofrAI @iamaheron_ @chaotictransfem Maybe! Would need to test it to be sure Aug 29	4	0	0	0	—	700
@YangZhang930512 It's perfect Aug 29	4	0	0	0	—	700
@illusiondiffuse Yes! You need to be opinionated to be a changemaker! Aug 29	2	0	1	0	—	700
@xeophon Hm. I need to clear my calendar more often for thiis Aug 29	2	0	1	0	—	700
@libpol_org @tautologer They need ai for the volume to spray and pray content. If they get called out for it they can just call it another false positive Aug 29	4	0	0	0	—	700
@animesh_garg work with you and @AjayMandlekar on Roboturk was formative for me! Aug 27	2	0	1	0	—	700
@PradyuPrasad Lol. This is what a few years between profile pictures does to a guy Aug 27	4	0	0	0	—	700
@ryan_huang_1 https://t.co/A7ZvvQHDE2 Haven't confirmed yet but a lot of the details match up! Aug 26	0	0	2	0	—	700
@maxsloef max Aug 25	4	0	0	0	—	700
@sergeantsup If you happen to decide to play disco elysium, get it for any platform but the switch. The switch port specifically is really laggy Aug 25	2	0	1	0	—	700
@toasterlighting @keysmashbandit @hopes_revenge Soft, if you’re good Aug 20	4	0	0	0	—	700
@Jris420 @pangram I'm not an AI agent. Do you see the first apostrophe in Don't (2nd word) is straight in pic 1 and curly in pic 2? Same with the "it's human" in line 3 Aug 19	4	0	0	0	—	700
@Nexuist @aliceisplaying why does he keep making new ones Aug 18	2	0	1	0	—	700
@imitationlearn I think the braindead feed is fine for people who spend 15 mins a day here. Just the viral hits. But you can also get that from ig meme pages that repost from twitter. Curious what you would want to see more of? Aug 17	2	0	1	0	—	700
@dingchilling @ctjlewis 2) this was AI-generated, as a way to text the Pangram bot on X articles https://t.co/iWvxagutFc Aug 16	2	0	1	0	—	700
@Aizkmusic “Here’s my honest answer” Aug 16	4	0	0	0	—	700
sure, maybe a different example where two tokens have the probs A - 0.70 B - 0.30 with temp = 1, token A is chosen 70% of the time and B chosen 30% of the time, at random With a distortionary watermark, maybe token A ends up getting chosen more often overall and B is chosen less often. But with a distortion-free watermark, the distribution is preserved. Token A is still chosen the same number of times as it would have chosen in the non-watermark scheme. The 70% holds in aggregate, over many many runs, but the watermark algorithm is deciding when to make this 70% happen instead of letting the random number generator do the work. Aug 16	2	0	1	0	—	700
@IsaacKing314 Yeah I don’t really see the reason to release something like this even if it was possible Aug 15	4	0	0	0	—	700
@lkbm I think it undersells what pangram does but it’s partly right. Also pangram doesn’t use perplexity! Aug 15	4	0	0	0	—	700
@MetacriticCap Yeah for sure Aug 14	4	0	0	0	—	700
@maybeYonas @AlanLevinovitz @pangram Yeah it would definitely be an opt-in thing and not the default I’m not sure i would use it, but i know many people are asking for it Aug 14	2	0	1	0	—	700
@beyarkay I worry a little bit about clutter or putting it in a place where it could get cropped. thinking about it Aug 12	2	0	1	0	—	700
@Proziam @_ueaj @scaling01 This is a claim of a single false positive, completely different than "Pangram flags tons of older texts as being 90+ percent AI generated" Aug 12	2	0	1	0	—	700
@Proziam @_ueaj @scaling01 An extraordinary claim requires extraordinary evidence Aug 12	2	0	1	0	—	700
@theRealJohnPeng It’s just a consultant swarm Aug 12	4	0	0	0	—	700
@dorkweeb for now, DMs. We're going to create a false positive / false negative form soon Aug 10	4	0	0	0	—	700
@tyler_johnston @Benthamsbulldog Uh, increasingly less convinced that 99% of farmed animals live in CAFOs. I think the authors of the cited study overestimated the number of CAFOs by a factor of 8 by assuming all farms are AFOs when that is not the case https://t.co/jAhxTquL28 Aug 9	2	0	1	0	—	700
@FeralPHunter @squirtle_says @pangram Catch me some time I’ll get you one Aug 9	4	0	0	0	—	700
@aliceisplaying @ghostiesdagger Heard Aug 8	4	0	0	0	—	700
@thkostolansky @norvid_studies Yes all you have to do is sign our employment contract Aug 8	4	0	0	0	—	700
@sonikudzu @orphcorp OMG another christian ai writer popped up on threads today https://t.co/bQEwNssxI0 Aug 6	2	0	1	0	—	700
@hecubian_devil @EmmaTolkin @pangram @calebgamman @keysmashbandit Looking into it! Sorry if it’s a FP, will triage. Aug 4	2	0	1	0	—	700
@JustMicrock @chaotictransfem @hive_ai I need to figure out how to do this programmatically Aug 4	2	0	1	0	—	700
@wiretransfer @T3chFalcon @pangram @pangram ai? https://t.co/OgqrdI7Ht5 Aug 2	2	0	1	0	—	700
two different paradigms! for approaching average-human performance, pretraining is good enough. Writing got to average human performance very quickly, because there was a lot of it! You can even make the argument for getting above average-for-human results by selecting good data to train on. but today, people realized that RL on verifiable domains is how you produce superhuman results (i.e. math). It's a new paradigm and this doesn't preclude some other way that we improve writing that doesn't involve verification of correctness. We just don't know yet! Aug 1	2	0	1	0	—	700
@sean_geiger Probably has a lot of similarities But even so, trading success is verifiable and quantifiable over time whereas cultural and consumer sentiment is fuzzier and noisier Aug 1	2	0	1	0	—	700
@joshtrazyn ✨ Made with AI ✨ Aug 31	1	0	1	0	—	600
@bcantrill @pangram @ahl looking forward to it! Aug 31	3	0	0	0	—	600
@joshycodes joshyprompts is available (pls don't, that's a negative aura change) Aug 29	1	0	1	0	—	600
@icerandogirl well people work hard doing stuff they hate all the time for money. just look at the consulting industry Aug 29	1	0	1	0	—	600
@adastroworld hmm. I don't think I agree. I think if you look at <<the best in the world>> at any given talent, skill, or field, everyone at the top loves what they do. Aug 29	1	0	1	0	—	600
@Le_Slye @Guarromantico_ Omg you’re right https://t.co/X9LJkEiHKv Aug 29	3	0	0	0	—	600
@honorablepicnic @keysmashbandit DMs open! Thanks for sharing + we would triage it internally Aug 29	1	0	1	0	—	600
@full_kelly_ @tbpn if only it was a stack ranking rather than a collection of people that TIME wanted to write about Aug 28	3	0	0	0	—	600
@calxoxo thanks so much Calissa! Aug 27	1	0	1	0	—	600
@ZyMazza oh oops Tharin* Aug 27	3	0	0	0	—	600
@fudgeposting Thanks man! Aug 27	3	0	0	0	—	600
@gptbrooke Thanks Brooke! Aug 27	3	0	0	0	—	600
@mariusschober @threepointone actually smart Aug 27	1	0	1	0	—	600
@osoleve continue Aug 26	3	0	0	0	—	600
@EntropyChase @HashtagGriswold yeah AI writing is still very mode collapsed. it takes a construction sometimes used in good writing, and turns it up to 11, using it way too frequently to be considered "good" Aug 26	1	0	1	0	—	600
@joshtrazyn Yeah they flag images with simple metadata checks. Previously I used the disclosure feature to show you. It wasn’t actually made with ai Aug 25	1	0	1	0	—	600
@joshtrazyn No i think they are just using the self disclosure Aug 25	1	0	1	0	—	600
@sergeantsup Rhythm heaven is out on the switch now Aug 25	1	0	1	0	—	600
@N8Programs I learned i’m really really bad at mmlu Aug 22	1	0	1	0	—	600
@sergeantsup I don't go out of my way to go to twitter meetups or meet people, but I still have made ~three friends on twitter. I have also hired three people from twitter! Overall net very positive Aug 20	1	0	1	0	—	600
@pangram @januarycomputer @AndrewCurran_ Bad bot try again. @pangram read the image https://t.co/DFKOooc9Hh Aug 20	1	0	1	0	—	600
it's not 100% confidence, it's just amount of the document. for very short docs it's typically all or nothing. it looks like the apostrophes are different. This is definitely undesirable behavior that a small change has a disproportionately large impact on the result by pushing the prediction over the threshold. Aug 19	1	0	1	0	—	600
@Jris420 @pangram interesting. Haven't seen this one specifically, I think there is definitely some undesirable jitter in short text that we are working to hammer out Aug 19	1	0	1	0	—	600
@astridwilde1 makes sense Aug 18	3	0	0	0	—	600
@squirtle_says @snoopy_dot_jpg They know you’re made of money Aug 18	1	0	1	0	—	600
@GrantSlatton @GetRowZero yeah seems like a limitation Aug 17	3	0	0	0	—	600
@1thousandfaces_ 🦷👄🦷 Aug 17	3	0	0	0	—	600
@dingchilling @ctjlewis 3) this one was actually a false positive from Pangram 3.2 (result still cached for me). Pangram 4 says it's human https://t.co/TP3kSnERAe Aug 16	1	0	1	0	—	600
@dingchilling @ctjlewis 1) this was AI-generated, as a joke https://t.co/ubsJzitxKY Aug 16	1	0	1	0	—	600
@dingchilling @ctjlewis my chrome extension has logged 3 AI tweets by me (below) https://t.co/pRmsRL94D6 Aug 16	1	0	1	0	—	600
@UmbralVixen @pangram I love herman miller aeron chairs. Aug 14	1	0	1	0	—	600
@ZyMazza @pangram Yes! Come by Aug 14	1	0	1	0	—	600
@psiloycne @pangram We JUST moved in Aug 14	1	0	1	0	—	600
@chernclassifier Not today! Aug 11	1	0	1	0	—	600
@AndrewCurran_ That would be cool if they are! Aug 10	3	0	0	0	—	600
@tyler_johnston @Benthamsbulldog just want to reiterate that I don't deny that there are many farm animals subject to inhumane treatment. just really digging into this one number as a way to procrastinate on writing emails more or less Aug 9	1	0	1	0	—	600
@vishalmisra @deedydas happy to take a look if you're up for sharing here or in DMs Aug 9	1	0	1	0	—	600
@shakoistsLog Seems reasonable Aug 7	3	0	0	0	—	600
@DispairSoftware @rob_mcrobberson Not cheating, I promise. It would be insane to be able to memorize or fully index all pre ChatGPT text Aug 5	3	0	0	0	—	600
@hecubian_devil @EmmaTolkin @pangram @calebgamman @keysmashbandit Yep! Happens unfortunately although a little more rare with each new model release. Aug 4	1	0	1	0	—	600
@Jacobkupp that's optimistic Aug 4	1	0	1	0	—	600
@chaotictransfem @hive_ai WAIT I have @hive_ai blocked why can it reply in my comments? Is there some API workaround we can use with for the Pangram bot? https://t.co/0CXkvq2oC6 Aug 4	1	0	1	0	—	600
@AfterDaylight I sure hope so Aug 4	1	0	1	0	—	600
@beyarkay thanks! Aug 4	3	0	0	0	—	600
@anistotle_ it's probably fine Aug 4	1	0	1	0	—	600
@wavesandgrace Unfortunately we outgrew TJ's. It's Costco snacks now, for better or for worse Aug 4	1	0	1	0	—	600
@ThePlaidCons @pangram absolutely not Aug 3	3	0	0	0	—	600
@EdgarGaray82 @paulg if you're unwilling to spend a little time on a cold email, you've got to understand how that's a negative signal for a busy reader whose inbox is filled with cold email and spam Aug 3	1	0	1	0	—	600
Actually I think this is a really good point, maybe the real separation between 2 and 3 is whether the reward model changes with the availability of this capability (and trading should be in 3) I was thinking about cultural adaptation of human preference but didn’t realize that this also applies to trading alpha Aug 2	1	0	1	0	—	600
@lateinteraction I’m method oriented but lucky for me my method of choice is deep learning Aug 2	3	0	0	0	—	600
@schleebster @chaotictransfem Not only is it unpatched, it’s still the best method by a huge margin Aug 2	3	0	0	0	—	600
@labtec901 @cephaloform thanks for sharing! Aug 31	0	0	1	0	—	500
@frits Oh jeez. Not good. thanks for the heads up Aug 30	0	0	1	0	—	500
@shitpost9000 Under today’s limitations, yes. I’ve seen GPT image upscales that pangram says are AI Aug 30	2	0	0	0	—	500
@OliviaHelenS @lazy_grad @Benthamsbulldog @pangram It’s possible but you really have to try Aug 29	2	0	0	0	—	500
@benglickenhaus Believe what Aug 29	2	0	0	0	—	500
@willcb @jakehalloran1 (this is a joke btw) Aug 29	2	0	0	0	—	500
@N8Programs @tautologer I’ll try to make an actual post about it when i can compile some evidence Aug 29	2	0	0	0	—	500
@EthanAlley @ethanniser yup more or less correct, all major frontier instruct models pangram does quite well on. personal fine tunes or base models, less so. but pangram has a very very low false positive rate (incorrectly classifying human text as AI) Aug 27	2	0	0	0	—	500
@QiaochuYuan Thanks so much QC! Aug 27	2	0	0	0	—	500
@qorprate cursed indeed Aug 27	2	0	0	0	—	500
@shaurizard nah i'm safe https://t.co/zMaYXXjNxg Aug 27	2	0	0	0	—	500
@lu__jasper thanks Jasper!! Aug 27	2	0	0	0	—	500
@benleo_econ Thanks Ben!! Aug 27	2	0	0	0	—	500
@dingchilling Thanks! Aug 27	2	0	0	0	—	500
@shakoistsLog @chaotictransfem yes hmu! Aug 25	2	0	0	0	—	500
@kanateven @GrantSlatton @bchesky i am fairly certain that was an actual hack and the hacker was trying to warm the account before pumping a coin Aug 24	0	0	1	0	—	500
@AndyMasley it looks real to me Aug 20	2	0	0	0	—	500
@cwarzel Did you have fun? Aug 20	2	0	0	0	—	500
@rosmine @HamelHusain @pangram Wishing you the best! I'm rooting for a world where we have great writing models and great coding models, both equally detectable in the limit Aug 19	2	0	0	0	—	500
@ahall_research @AnthropicAI congratulations! Aug 18	2	0	0	0	—	500
@contrasortem noted! Aug 17	2	0	0	0	—	500
@nthglsn @joshuabrobeck @claw X reserves the right to take any action, including reclaiming the handle. At least they didn’t take your money Aug 14	0	0	1	0	—	500
@entirelyuseles What do you pay OpenAI for? Aug 12	2	0	0	0	—	500
@_brimtown @pangram hell yeah Aug 11	2	0	0	0	—	500
@confusionm8trix Oh yeah absolutely Aug 10	2	0	0	0	—	500
@_vatsadev @mike64_t this is kind of outdated but 0.4% FPR reported (i cannot see the above post, locked account? https://t.co/Ple09LWlFT Aug 10	0	0	1	0	—	500
@istishhadia41 @tyler_johnston @Benthamsbulldog it's not nitpicking to look at the definitions behind the primary statistic that somebody bases their argument on if the argument was "it doesn't matter whether you factory farm or not, taking an animal's life is unethical" then I wouldn't be talking about factory farms Aug 9	0	0	1	0	—	500
@deepfates @lfschiavo Bullish on this line of research. Very excited to see what comes! Aug 5	2	0	0	0	—	500
@Rohanburdened points at 100% AI score "i guess that means pangram is not infallible" was it wrong? "no" Aug 5	2	0	0	0	—	500
@Tim_Hua_ Hell yeah Aug 3	2	0	0	0	—	500
@trevorbchen @pangram Text should probably say AI-transformed rather than AI-generated, maybe we can get that info from C2PA Aug 3	0	0	1	0	—	500
@trevorbchen @pangram yes! hopefully C2PA can capture some of the major image transformations (for this one it seems the model says human after an 8x upscale) https://t.co/H2z3wA7SMK Aug 3	0	0	1	0	—	500
@trevorbchen @pangram q: on AI upscaled images, currently my intuition is that a sufficiently high multiple of an upscale would result in hallucinated details. obviously not ideal to categorize the right as "not AI" imo What taxonomy would you propose? https://t.co/PiZQ1nFXVv Aug 3	0	0	1	0	—	500
@axat_div @parradaigm @paulg got any examples? dms open. FPR is still 1 in 10,000 on pre-2022 text and even light AI polished text Aug 3	0	0	1	0	—	500
@Tyler_Menzer @SGamarad @AndyMasley @pangram these are transcripts from two different videos, no? Aug 2	0	0	1	0	—	500
@bhai_joshi17 I meant playing games, not making games. Chess, Go, etc Aug 2	0	0	1	0	—	500
@Drachs1978 Yeah, this is the one that I know the least about. If you have a new chip design, do you need to actually manufacture it to know if it’s going to work? Aug 1	2	0	0	0	—	500
@myhandle @TetraspaceWest That would be awesome Aug 1	2	0	0	0	—	500
@willsolfiac I think this belongs in tier 2, real-world verifiable but time bounded like forecasting Aug 1	2	0	0	0	—	500
@L0rd_Gerion Yeah that’s a good analogy Aug 1	2	0	0	0	—	500
yeah I think fair to agree to disagree. I don't think everyone who loves baking sourdough needs to become a professional baker but also if you want to become a professional baker you should love baking, or the operational side, or the community building side of owning a bakery. some aspect of it has to be enticing Aug 29	1	0	0	0	—	400
@ttywisp @albertjward_ @hosseeb @pangram @keysmashbandit hahahaha. I'm sad I missed it. I've seen this behavior from real journalists as well who ASKED CHATGPT for a literary excerpt, it hallucinated some text that Pangram flagged, and then they had the gall to ask us to comment on it Aug 29	1	0	0	0	—	400
@tautologer The post is now deleted. Interesting... Aug 29	1	0	0	0	—	400
@Somil_Agg Thanks man! Aug 28	1	0	0	0	—	400
@johnhboyer thanks John! Aug 27	1	0	0	0	—	400
@morgan_sung Thanks Morgan!!! Aug 27	1	0	0	0	—	400
@mar_kar_ thanks so much, Marzena! Aug 27	1	0	0	0	—	400
@Shripriya Thanks Shripriya! appreciate the support throughout our journey Aug 27	1	0	0	0	—	400
@ollieforsyth Thanks Ollie! Aug 27	1	0	0	0	—	400
@EntropyChase @HashtagGriswold I think part of the problem is that "good" writing requires having a unique voice which is hard to do when 10-40% of longform content is being generated by AI Aug 26	1	0	0	0	—	400
@DanielleFong Wow i love soul of the new machine Aug 26	1	0	0	0	—	400
@artrockalter @NewmanJ_R @PaulYacoubian For b2b it’s kind of annoying. But for consumer goods it ranges anywhere from discriminatory to an abuse of monopoly power Aug 19	1	0	0	0	—	400
@LiveFromVR @gabriel1 @SolipsRenatus Vibe coded too close to the sun Aug 18	1	0	0	0	—	400
@squirtle_says @snoopy_dot_jpg Thank you for playing, Stochastic parrot Aug 18	1	0	0	0	—	400
@cthorrez I want whatever Opus 4.6 is on Aug 15	1	0	0	0	—	400
@imitationlearn @pangram it's big that's for sure Aug 15	1	0	0	0	—	400
@wissam_antoun that's really cool! Aug 15	1	0	0	0	—	400
@ohhdanqi @pangram Come drop by! Aug 15	1	0	0	0	—	400
@TuhinChakr @pangram We’ll have you over soon for sure Aug 14	1	0	0	0	—	400
@nosilverv @MattPirkowski thanks! will triage this Aug 12	1	0	0	0	—	400
@spreadxeet @vsaietta @paul_conyngham @pangram oh it seems down. my bad. backfilling Aug 12	1	0	0	0	—	400
@LinchZhang That’s incredibly annoying Aug 6	1	0	0	0	—	400
@sonikudzu @orphcorp Could be true 1-5 guys can go a long way in the AI era Aug 6	1	0	0	0	—	400
@CleistaCelestia Correct scope is that machine translated human text is classified as human and machine translated ai text is classified as ai Aug 5	1	0	0	0	—	400
@_sy1vi3 @pangram Next time we gotta plan it not during defcon Aug 5	1	0	0	0	—	400
@zetalyrae Tasteful for sure Aug 5	1	0	0	0	—	400
@notegone That’s cool! I had no idea Aug 5	1	0	0	0	—	400
@andersonbcdefg Aug 5	1	0	0	0	—	400
@6851cf3c the ringing is compression but the lattice is GPT-image specific you can also notice it in the bread and food pattern https://t.co/u1CvmGDN1B or in the leaves here https://t.co/uWOcQPl8KZ Aug 4	1	0	0	0	—	400
@watermelon_ame @JustMicrock @omooretweets @DigvijayBokey @tucksbryant wrong website Aug 4	1	0	0	0	—	400
@BennettSchwartz it is, the benchmark is just old Aug 3	1	0	0	0	—	400
@wiretransfer @T3chFalcon @pangram Blocked, unfortunately Aug 3	1	0	0	0	—	400
@bradrcarson interesting thanks for sharing! If you're open to DMing me the text i'll look into it Aug 2	1	0	0	0	—	400
@mariusschober @TheZvi @pangram Yes! The chrome extension doesn’t use any dashboard credits (but it does have some abuse limits for edge cases) Aug 31	0	0	0	0	—	300
@El_Cuda @nic_carter 1) this is a joke 2) ai labs are not going to pause for 3 years 3) we get ASI when we get it Aug 31	0	0	0	0	—	300
@PEpigone bro i'm just expressing my opinions, move on if you don't care about what I have to say Aug 29	0	0	0	0	—	300
@SalesHedge @ben_sage Bad bot https://t.co/ViwHnTLgOr Aug 29	0	0	0	0	—	300
@AjayMandlekar @animesh_garg thanks so much Ajay! Aug 27	0	0	0	0	—	300
@thao_nguyen26 thanks thao!! Aug 27	0	0	0	0	—	300
@MiniRacker Thanks Mini! Aug 27	0	0	0	0	—	300
@altryne Thanks so much for being a believer, Alex! Aug 27	0	0	0	0	—	300
@_dinkD_ No, can you share Pangram results (from history)? Chances are something changed Aug 24	0	0	0	0	—	300
@pangram @karl28832 @MarkRuffalo sorry, brief bug where pangram 3 was being called instead of pangram 4 Aug 23	0	0	0	0	—	300
@arielchengg @pangram @Corca_math yeah, we should make the thread rollup more automatic I guess Aug 21	0	0	0	0	—	300
@PanPanworkshere @kthai1618 oooh looks good Aug 15	0	0	0	0	—	300
@DrellLabs @pangram No plans! Aug 15	0	0	0	0	—	300
@AaronBergman18 https://t.co/dxERJg37Vm Aug 13	0	0	0	0	—	300
@AviBittMD @Benthamsbulldog Thanks! Very informative. I was looking for data on factory farm conditions anyway, which CAFO seems to be an imperfect (low-recall?) measure of. Aug 10	0	0	0	0	—	300
@NelsonEdmundb Thank you I missed that at first 🙏 Aug 5	0	0	0	0	—	300
@juwitaxiska @JustMicrock @omooretweets @DigvijayBokey @tucksbryant tell us what Pangram says about your wedding photos! Aug 4	0	0	0	0	—	300
@agcintado @GonHuertas it's https://t.co/opjkDGaU6L. Aug 4	0	0	0	0	—	300
I think it largely depends on what exactly is scanned. If Andy scans 600 words that comes back as 80% AI but the full transcript is several thousands of words. Different transcription methods are also adding punctuation differently. It's hard to say for certain but I wouldn't be surprised if he had a small amount of AI notes that he ad-libbed off of Aug 3	0	0	0	0	—	300
@CliffLattner ok so maybe tier 2 then Aug 2	0	0	0	0	—	300
Total · 540 tweets in September 2026	93,650	1,567	1,994	497		10,545,000

Posts, replies, and quote tweets count — native retweets are excluded. Mentioning a project on the boost list doubles that tweet's points.